← All case files

File 03 · Talk · 2026

Queer Ecologies

Discovery Session #7 at Value Network Ventures: queer ecology and the more-than-human ecological imagination, applied to conservation work.

The reader who had to say yes: A whole climate organisation, most of them non-specialists

The brief, as it arrived

Lead an hour-long session for the whole organisation on an idea from outside their field, and make it useful to people who restore mangroves and broker carbon credits.

The problem underneath

Queer ecology can very quickly become theory for its own sake, and in a mixed room it can also be heard as a political position people are being asked to adopt.

The move

I gave the room a working vocabulary of four concepts (postnature, mutability, mutualism and transecology), each with an “in our work” application to conservation. It opened with a five-minute prompt, “What does ‘natural’ mean to you?”, and included a slide setting out what the session was and wasn’t arguing.

The writing

If “nature” has never been the fixed, orderly thing we were told it was, what else have we been calling “natural” simply because changing our minds about it felt harder than living with the category?
Closing provocation
ends on a question the room can take back to its own processes
no jargon in the last line people remember

What changed

Colleagues questioned what “natural” means in advertising and everyday language, connected it to livelihoods and resource depletion, and asked for more Global South perspectives. One called it among the most engaging and collaborative sessions the series had run.

Who saw it

“Queer ecology can very easily become abstract or overly theoretical, but they were able to make the ideas accessible and connect them back to the kind of work we do with communities, ecosystems, and conservation.”
Abhilasha Chattopadhyay, Social Scientist, Value Network Ventures